Technical Case Study Institution Resources Classroom About WELL
Links
Case Studies supported by WELL
Case Studies
Submit a Case Study

Language(s)

German

Learner level

High intermediate

Institution

UMIST

Name(s)

Mathias Schulze

Contact details

mathias@ccl.umist.ac.uk

Objectives

In 1996-98, I successfully tested the feasibility of web-conferencing with a group of final-year students. This year (1998/99), about fifty students were using a web-conferencing tool during their German writing classes and for self-study. The aim was to establish whether this technology helps advanced language learners to acquire writing skills.

Implementation

"WebCrossing is a server that runs on a Web site. It allows anyone with a standard Web browser to post and view messages on that site. People can post messages to the Web site, and respond to postings made by others." http://webcrossing.com/new303/product-summary.html

The messages are written in a message box that is part of the webpage learners have loaded in their browsers and are viewed by participants as part of automatically created webpages.

"The Web server uses the Common Gateway Interface (CGI), an industry-standard protocol, to work with Web Crossing. You don't need any special knowledge to install Web Crossing and to use CGI; the installation script will set up everything you need." (ibid.) "Getting the basic Web Crossing server up and running to this point is very straightforward, and generally takes no more than 5 to 10 minutes." (ibid.)

Our WebCrossing server is running on UNIX (web) server. Students access it with any web browser (normally installed on a PC). The WebCrossing discussion space is administrated via a web browser. The lecturer (sysop) can e.g. restrict access, edit all messages, sort and view them by student's name, and download discussions.

More information on WebCrossing can be found at http://webcrossing.com

Outcome

The tool - WebCrossing - is free for educational users (bronze license) and easy to install on a web server. Maintenance (adding new users, backup, lost passwords etc.) is done via an intuitive web interface. Students just need basic word-processing skills and familiarity with a web browser.

About fifty students (second and final-year students of Applied German, Mathematics and German, Computational Linguistics and German, International Management with German) registered without any problems with the server and used the tool throughout the academic year for most of their writing activities in class (1 hour per week) and for self-study. Only the conversation features (i.e. no real-time chatting) of WebCrossing have been used. I set up folders for each writing project (three per year and group) and discussions for each writing tasks. The types of tasks were:

  • material gathering (e.g. useful facts, subject-specific vocabulary, meta-communicative phrases for essay writing, secondary sources (bibliography and Web resources);
  • drafts of text fragments (e.g. introduction, annotation, summary, proposal, conclusion);
  • collaborative writing (re-telling of a story from the point of view of different characters in the story, text commentary from different points of view, summary of sections of a huge text).

Any piece of text posted to the server could be (and at times was) commented upon by other learners or by myself and was (when necessary and useful) corrected by myself. (Learners could not change the contribution of another learner, the lecturer (sysop/discussion host) could.

Evaluation

The software did not cause any technical problems. All technical problems (e.g. unexpected downtimes) were hardware failures (rather unreliable UNIX server(s)) or genuine network problems. The only computer-related problem students had was occasional data loss because of not having posted the text written to the server database at regular intervals. Evaluation was carried out through informal interviews and as part of the teaching review (questionnaires at the end of the year). Students welcomed the opportunity to produce texts for other members of the group on the computer and only got frustrated when hardware problems caused loss of work or disrupted the teaching and learning process in class. The advantages of using WebCrossing for writing activities are:

  • improved feedback
  • The tutor sees everything students write and can help individuals during the writing process and correct the work or respond to it (in threaded discussions) after the submission of the text.
  • The student can comment on work by others or compare his/her text to theirs.
  • better and more comprehensive material for revision
  • All texts produced throughout the year were accessible to group members up until the examination and were used for revision.
Next year, students will get a mark for the text portfolio posted in WebCrossing. This assessed element was introduced to encourage learners to make better use of the tool in their self-study. Some of the tasks will be structured differently to facilitate collaborative writing. Interested colleagues were introduced to WebCrossing and it is being used for one other course already.

Project url

N/A